* A story that kind of slipped under the radar in terms of public awareness.
by Seán McCárthaigh
Glanbia facilitated breaches of rules governing the
allocation of milk quotas by one of the group’s own directors, according to a
Department of Agriculture report.
It concluded that Glanbia – one of the country’s
largest public limited companies – had taken verbal instructions a non-executive
director, Bill Carroll, “to facilitate an incorrect reallocation of milk
supplies between two suppliers.”
Mr Carroll, a dairy farmer from outside Clonmel, Co
Tipperary, resigned as a director of Glanbia in November in the wake of the
controversy.
Letter written on behalf of Simon Coveney to Glanbia on June 4, 2014 |
An investigation by the Department of Agriculture
examined allegations that he had sold almost €300,000 of milk to Glanbia from
his Co Tipperary farm using the quota attached to Clongowes Wood College, a
well-known private boarding school run by the Jesuits in Co Kildare.
Milk quota rules stipulate that farmers are prohibited
from supplying milk that has not been produced by their own cows on their
holdings. Anyone who infringes such regulations is liable for substantial fines
if they supply more than their quota.
Documents obtained by the Irish Examiner under the
Freedom of Information Act show the Minister for Agriculture, Simon Coveney was
highly critical of Glanbia’s role in the controversy.
A report by his officials into milk quota
irregularities found Glanbia’s recording system was not operated in accordance
with milk quota regulations.
It found the group’s systems were “amenable to
alteration on the basis of a verbal instruction, either from a party outside or
within the company, and the necessary robust checks and balances were not in
place.”
A letter written to Glanbia’s chief executive, Jim
Bergin, on behalf of Mr Coveney in June 2014 stated: “It is clear the control
systems employed within your company were not, in this instance, of regulatory
standard and were contrary to the departmental rules in relation to the
administration of milk quotas and that [Glanbia] as a result facilitated a
series of non-compliant transactions.”
The department ordered Glanbia to take immediate
action to reallocate the milk incorrectly allocated to Clongowes Wood College
to Mr Carroll’s account and to collect the appropriate superlevy from him – an
amount of €143,000.
It required the company to address control weaknesses
in its quota management system and to inform the department exactly what
measures it had taken.
The department also instructed Glanbia to arrange and
fund independent verification that its control weaknesses had been identified.
Mr Bergin was informed that the matter had also been
referred to the Chief State Solicitor to see if a criminal prosecution was
warranted.
He replied: “We trust that further action will not be
necessary.”
The department was forced to contact Glanbia again
last October after it emerged that Mr Carroll had benefitted from the
distribution of unused milk quota – known as flexi-milk – to the value of
€30,000.
Follow-up letter to Glanbia on Oct 22, 2015 |
The department’s assistant general secretary, Brendan
Gleeson, ordered Glanbia to withdraw any flexi-milk allocation to Mr Carroll
and to arrange to collect any outstanding superlevy from him. The letter again
expressed Mr Coveney’s “deep concern” about “the manner in which this matter
has been dealt with by Glanbia.”
The department instructed Glanbia to redistribute the
superlevy collected from Mr Carroll to the 290 famers who had been
disadvantaged by about €112 each as a result of the allocation to the form
In a reply on November 6 last year Mr Begin said
Glanbia had “at all times taken this matter very seriously and co-operated
fully with the department’s investigation.”
The Glanbia chief executive acknowledged that an
internal review carried out by the group on foot of the allegations against Mr
Carroll had highlighted there was “insufficient documentation in place to support the manual amendments processed by Glanbia milk department.”
However, Mr Bergin also stressed that it was “an
isolated incident involving a range of exceptional circumstances.”
During a Dáil debate in November, Mr Coveney said he had accepted the recommendation of his officials that a criminal prosecution of the matter should not be pursued.
During a Dáil debate in November, Mr Coveney said he had accepted the recommendation of his officials that a criminal prosecution of the matter should not be pursued.
The minister declined to reveal the legal advice he
had received from the Chief State solicitor but said his officials had regard
to the fact that corrective action was taken, there was no financial gain for
any of the parties and a superlevy had
been paid.
Sinn Féin TD, Martin Ferris observed the case “stinks
to high heaven.” “This was blatant
attempted fraud at the very least,” said the Kerry North TD.
He claimed he had received information that the Chief
State Solicitor had recommended the issue be referred to gardaí.
M Coveney said he had been advised by the department’s
secretary general, Aidan O’Driscoll, that the facts of the case were “not so
clear as to provide a sufficient degree of probability that a prosecution would
succeed.”
The Department refused to release documents containing
a record of an interview carried out under caution with Mr Carroll.
No comments:
Post a Comment