Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Fianna Fáil-Green coalition arranged cheaper electricity for large businesses at expense of ordinary consumers during economic downturn

by Seán McCárthaigh

The Fianna Fáil-Green government led by former Taoiseach, Brian Cowen, deliberately chose to impose higher electricity prices on ordinary households in the middle of the economic downturn in order to reduce energy costs for 1,500 large business users.                                
Cabinet papers released under the Freedom of Information Act show the coalition discriminated against domestic consumers by favouring cost-cutting measures to support some of the biggest multinationals in Ireland.
The documents show that in July 2009 the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, Eamon Ryan sought Government approval for “the permanent rebalancing from October 1, 2010 of network tariffs towards Large Energy Users (LEUs) to be paid for by higher prices to domestic consumers.”
The addition of €50m to domestic customer tariffs added more than 3% to household electricity bills, although its impact was effectively nullified by a subsequent fall in international fossil fuel prices.








Justifying its decision, the Government noted that industry groups had regularly complained about the disparity between household electricity prices in Ireland which were “broadly competitive” with other EU countries and much higher energy costs for large companies.
Faced with the prospect of having to find €1 billion to maintain existing subsidy levels to avoid price rises for all electricity customers, the Cabinet voted instead to only provide such supports for large industry at the lower cost of just €176m.
Ryan also sought a special dividend of €176m from the ESB, from the profits of its sale of a generating plant to Spanish electricity firm, Endesa in order to ensure that LEU’s faced no increase in electricity network charges in 2009-2010.
He pointed out that all electricity users were benefitting from subsidies totalling €567m, which he described as “extraordinary measures taken to prevent major (40%) increases in electricity prices in 2008 as international fossil fuel prices soared.” However, he also acknowledged that they could only be “a temporary remedy.”
As the subsidies were set to expire in September 2009, Ryan warned that LEUs would see their electricity bills increase by up to 30% unless special measures were taken.
The document shows that the Cabinet Committee on Economic Renewal whose membership consisted of Ryan, Cowen, Finance Minister Brian Lenihan and Tánaiste, Mary Coughlan decided that large energy users should face no increases in their electricity bills.
Ryan highlighted how many LEUs were based in the technological, pharmaceutical and food and drink sectors and were major employers, representing a significant proportion of Irish export income. He claimed other EU countries had also adopted various measurers to keep energy costs lower for large businesses.
The Government also took care to note that electricity prices for Irish households were 4-7% below the EU average.
“A rebalancing of network tariffs in favour of LEUs, achieved through higher network charges for domestic users, would help safe-guard employment in some of our most critical and export-oriented industries,” observed Ryan.
It was estimated that adding €50m to domestic customer tariffs would also add €5m to the social welfare bill for providing free electricity units to some customers.
Ryan anticipated that such a measure would “prove unpopular” but argued households could still avail of discounts from ESB’s competitors which had recently entered the electricity market.
However, he added: “The rebalancing of tariffs would send a clear signal to industry that Government is committed to improving the competitiveness of energy costs for business as part of the overall competitiveness challenge.”
Rebates for LEUs were eventually ended in September 2012. Ireland currently has the 7th most expensive electricity in the EU for LEUs with prices about 8% above the EU average.
Asked this week about the issue, Ryan – the current Green Party leader – said it was a difficult decision but “employment was a huge issue at the time.”






Sunday, May 17, 2015

Millfield Manor - Full version of Sunday Times piece from May 17, 2015




More than 20 inspections carried out by planning officials of an estate in Newbridge, Co Kildare, which has been at the centre of growing concern about the safety of homes following a dramatic fire earlier this year, failed to identify any major problems during its construction phase.

Kildare Co Council has revealed its building control inspectors conducted in excess of 20 visits of Millfield Manor between 2005 and 2009 when a range of houses and apartments were being built by Barrack Construction, a development company run by Kildare builder, Paddy Byrne.

“Only significant incidents or issues identified by the inspector would be noted on the file,” said a council spokesperson.

However, documents released under the Freedom of Information Act show only one short hand-written note was filed as a result of building compliance inspections on Millfield Manor by council staff. It related to an issue with cavity barriers in some units during a routine inspection in December 2005. The council said the problem had been rectified within a fortnight.

The estate is at the centre of a major controversy following a dramatic fire on March 31 which completely gutted a terrace of six houses in around 30 minutes. Fears about the safety of their homes have increased for residents following the completion of a report commissioned by the local authority after the recent fire.

The report, which examined the condition of 10 unoccupied houses in terms of compliance with fire safety regulations of buildings, identified serious failings with the construction of housing units in Millfield Manor.  It found “numerous deficiencies” in the timber-frame separating walls between houses. In particular, such walls were inadequately completed at attic and lower floor levels.

Surveyors found boards between the system-built chimneys were not properly fixed, while there was inadequate fire stopping near the roof. They also discovered deficiencies with the external walls of the surveyed houses including the absence of cavity barriers.

The fire safety engineers said the recommended remedial works to make the buildings safe would require the removal of roof tiles and parts of chimney stacks.

“Given the number of faults that have recently been identified, it’s extraordinary how the council could have conducted that number of inspections and not have detected them,” said local independent councillor, Willie Crowley.

Residents have estimated that the problems are so extensive that it could cost each homeowner around €30,000 to make their property safe, while also requiring them to find alternative accommodation while such work was being carried out.

Crowley said residents were extremely disappointed by the outcome of a meeting with council officials on Friday when they were advised they would have to hire their own fire safety engineers to examine the condition of their homes as the local authority had no responsibility to carry out such work.

The Sunday Times revealed last week that apartment blocks at Millfield Manor have also been the subject of a number of fire safety notices issued by Kildare Fire Service in recent years.

It is understood a number of parties including a property management company are facing a criminal prosecution over the poor standard of fire-resistant glazing in some apartment blocks on the estate.

Kildare Co Council admitted the level of inspection of Millfield Manor by its fire safety officers was greater than for similar developments based on a risk assessment.
Asked about the failure of the local authority’s building inspectors to uncover any of the deficiencies highlighted in the recent report, a council spokesperson said the building control code relied to a significant extent on the statutory responsibility of practitioners in the construction industry to design and construct buildings in accordance with building regulations

“The random inspections undertaken by building control authorities are essentially supplementary to this primary statutory obligation,” she remarked.

The spokesperson said Kildare Co Council had exceeded the target level of inspections – which was 12-15% of new buildings notified to local authorities in commencement notices – during the construction phase of Milltown Manor.

She also explained that a €400,000 bond, which residents have called on the local authority to draw down to fund the repair of their homes, only related to the satisfactory completion of public infrastructure on the estate and could not cover any works to individual houses or apartment blocks.

Meanwhile, it is understood that Environment Minister, Alan Kelly has agreed to meet with residents of Millifield Manor over the coming weeks to discuss their situation.


Fire safety report on Millfield Manor from 2013

Here's a fire safety re-inspection report on apartment blocks at Millfield Manor from 2013




Ulitmately the prosecution did not go ahead after the problems identified in the report were rectified...but only after a legal warning.

Kildare Co Council's records of planning inspections on Millfield Manor


More than 20 inspections carried out by planning officials of an estate in Newbridge, Co Kildare, which has been at the centre of growing concern about the safety of homes following a dramatic fire earlier this year, failed to identify any major problems during its construction phase.



Kildare Co Council has revealed its building control inspectors conducted in excess of 20 visits of Millfield Manor between 2005 and 2009 when a range of houses and apartments were being built by Barrack Construction, a development company run by Kildare builder, Paddy Byrne.

This is the sole record on the council's file as a result of those 20-plus inspections



Sunday, May 10, 2015

Millfield Manor - Newbridge

Records released by Kildare County Council show that inspectors from its Fire Service have repeatedly found major problems with the fire safety of apartments at Millfield Manor in Newbridge.

The estate was the scene of a controversial fire which gutted a terraced row of six houses in under 30 minutes on March 31, 2015.


Residents fear the problems which were highlighted both from the recent fire and past inspection reports are prevalent in most homes within Millfield Manor.

The remit of the Fire Service is confined to apartment blocks on the estate..

Here's the first report it carried out on Millfield Manor in 2009







And here's another report from the Kildare Fire Service on apartment blocks in Millfield Manor from 2011